International concerns are growing about Nord Stream 2 - but Germany and Russia remain determined to build the 745-mile natural gas pipeline connecting their countries
It would double what is already the longest sub-sea pipeline in the world and significantly reduce the European Union’s carbon emissions – but the Nord Stream 2 project is not without controversy.
UK foreign secretary, Boris Johnson this week joined the US, Poland, Ukraine and the Baltic states in condemning Germany and Russia’s plans to press ahead with the construction of the huge gas pipeline between the two countries.
It has caused growing conflicts between the Europe and the US due to the impact it would have by increasing the continent’s reliance on Russia for natural gas and effectively cutting out countries in between from any deals.
In addition to the conflicts, the US has also threatened sanctions on European companies involved including Royal Dutch Shell, Austria’s OMV, France’s Engie and Germany’s Wintershall and Uniper.
German foreign ministry official Peter Beyer says: “This is a further burden for the trans-Atlantic relationship.”
But what actually is the project and why are Russia and Germany so determined to see it through?
What is Nord Stream 2?
The complex project is an addition to Nord Stream 1, which opened in 2011 and runs from Vyborg in Russia to Greifswald in Germany.
Operated by the Nord Stream AG natural gas consortium, it is the longest sub-sea pipeline in the world at 759 miles.
The 745-mile Nord Stream 2 pipeline would carry about 51 billion cubic metres of natural gas underwater using 200,000 pipes from Russia to Germany, while bypassing Poland and other countries in the region.
According to the consortium, using gas to power electricity creates about 50% fewer carbon emissions per kilowatt-hour than using coal.
It means the Nord Stream 2 project could also save about 14% of the EU’s total carbon emissions from power generation – if natural gas from the pipeline was used to replace coal-fired power stations.
For Germany, the construction has already started and the project means more gas despite nuclear and coal power plant phasing out.
The £8.7bn Nord Stream 2 project is due to be completed in 2019 and will make its way through the Baltic Sea to Germany and follow the track of the existing Nord Stream 1 – making the pipeline’s annual capacity 110 billion cubic metres.
Russia is likely to benefit the most from the Nord Stream 2 as it currently supplies 34% of European gas – and this would rise to more than 40%.
German officials have claimed the pipeline leads to economic savings by getting rid of transit fees, as the transit countries would be bypassed, while the consortium says it would better connect Europe’s gas network.
It will, however, destroy the concept of diversifying supplies, and Ukraine has been in opposition against Russia and Germany – as it would lose natural gas transit revenues of up to £539m annually.
However, Germany has been on the project’s defence, making comments on how the Nord Stream 2 is for commercial purposes and not political.
It has also said the project is needed to fill an energy gap left by the phasing out of nuclear plants.
Here’s what’s being said
The US adminstration has put pressure on Europe to abandon the deal in exchange for avoiding a trade war and has even gone as far as threatening sanctions against businesses involved in the project.
A senior state department official in the US says it would cause a security threat as it would give Russia the chance to install “undersea surveillance equipment” such as “listening devices” in the Baltic.
However, President of Russia, Vladimir Putin is not giving in and, during a press conference with German chancellor Angela Merkel earlier this month, he said: “We will continue gas shipments (via Ukraine) as long as they are economically justified.”
In Putin’s defence, Ms Merkel said: “Germany believes Ukraine’s role as a transit country should continue after the construction of Nord Stream 2… it has a strategic importance.
“Germany, Britain, France and all our EU colleagues support this deal and will continue to support it.
“The deal is not perfect, but it is better than a lack of a deal. It guarantees more control and more security.”
Up until now, Britain has tried to keep a low profile on the topic, but this week UK foreign secretary Boris Johnson spoke out in a letter he released to pro-Polish British MPs.
Johnson said “it is right to highlight the divisiveness of this pipeline across Europe”, adding that “Euro-Atlantic unity remains our strongest tool in standing up to malign Russian activity.”