Compelo Energy is using cookies

We use them to give you the best experience. If you continue using our website, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website.

ContinueLearn More

Table 6, Qualitative comparison of the environmental performance of a hypothetical linked-basins TPP of the flow-through type, as described in this section vis–vis the chosen standard of comparison, a single-basin, double-effect TPP, Type Z, at Fundy s Cumberland Basin. The tabulation shows which of the two types scores highest for optimum environmental performance.

NOTE: Re D, Sea-mammal survival: TPPs should be designed and operated to keep sea mammals away from the hydraulic turbines. This applies equally to both types B and Z and therefore does not affect a comparison between the two.
DE = double-effect; SE = single effect; HB = high-basin; LB = low-basin Linked-Bs = linked-basins

Environmental effects A B C E F
Type of TPP Linked-Bs, SE, flow through type at an imaginary site Single-basin, DE, at Fundy Cumberland Basin. Tyoe Z Size of linked-bs too small to affect tidal regimes
TPP parameters
Mean, natural tidal range 5.64 m 10.0 m
Mean tidal range within hign basin as % of natural tide 49% 68 % Z Z
Mean tidal range within low basin as % of natural tide 46% 68 % Z Z
Mean water level within high basin, compared to natural conditions +1.28m -0.12m Z Z
Mean water level within low basin compared to natural conditions -1.02m -0.12m Z Linked-Bs
Number of passes through turbines for a fish going in-and-out of TPP 1 2 Linked-Bs
Plant operation at or close to the rhythm of the natural tide no yes
Maximum head across turbines 3.68m 4.62m Linked Bs
Maximum water velocities through turbines 11.47m/sec 11.9m/sec Linked-Bs
Stagnant flow within high basin % of the time 35% 18 % Z
Stagnant flow within low basin % of the time 35 % 18 % Z
Simplicity and effectiveness of flow patterns See Fig. 6 linked Bs
Total scores for Linked-Bs, SE plant, through-type layout 10 0 3 1
Total scores for Type Z, DE 4 4 0 1